{"id":1012,"date":"2025-01-16T05:40:10","date_gmt":"2025-01-16T12:40:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/?p=1012"},"modified":"2025-01-19T14:42:51","modified_gmt":"2025-01-19T21:42:51","slug":"how-to-spot-a-liar-pamela-meyer-ted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/16\/how-to-spot-a-liar-pamela-meyer-ted\/","title":{"rendered":"How to spot a liar | Pamela Meyer | TED"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div class=\"youtube-embed\" style=\"position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; margin: 1.5em 0;\"><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/P_6vDLq64gE?feature=oembed&#038;rel=0\" title=\"How to spot a liar | Pamela Meyer | TED\" style=\"position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border: 0;\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen loading=\"lazy\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p> Okay, now I don&#39;t want<br \/>\nto alarm anybody in this room, but it&#39;s just come to my attention<br \/>\nthat the person to your right is a liar. (Laughter) Also, the person to your left is a liar. Also the person sitting<br \/>\nin your very seats is a liar. We&#39;re all liars. What I&#39;m going to do today is I&#39;m going to show you what the research<br \/>\nsays about why we&#39;re all liars, how you can become a liespotter and why you might want<br \/>\nto go the extra mile and go from liespotting to truth seeking, and ultimately to trust building.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Now, speaking of trust, ever since I wrote<br \/>\nthis book, &quot;Liespotting,&quot; no one wants to meet me in person<br \/>\nanymore, no, no, no, no, no. They say, &quot;It&#39;s okay, we&#39;ll email you.&quot; (Laughter) I can&#39;t even get<br \/>\na coffee date at Starbucks. My husband&#39;s like, &quot;Honey, deception? Maybe you could have focused on cooking.<br \/>\nHow about French cooking?&quot; So before I get started,<br \/>\nwhat I&#39;m going to do is I&#39;m going to clarify my goal for you, which is not to teach a game of Gotcha. Liespotters aren&#39;t those nitpicky kids, those kids in the back of the room<br \/>\nthat are shouting, &quot;Gotcha! Gotcha! Your eyebrow twitched.<br \/>\nYou flared your nostril.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>I watch that TV show &#39;Lie To Me.&#39;<br \/>\nI know you&#39;re lying.&quot; No, liespotters are armed with scientific knowledge<br \/>\nof how to spot deception. They use it to get to the truth, and they do what mature<br \/>\nleaders do everyday; they have difficult conversations<br \/>\nwith difficult people, sometimes during very difficult times. And they start up that path<br \/>\nby accepting a core proposition, and that proposition is the following: Lying is a cooperative act. Think about it, a lie has no power<br \/>\nwhatsoever by its mere utterance. Its power emerges when someone else agrees<br \/>\nto believe the lie. So I know it may sound like tough love, but look, if at some point<br \/>\nyou got lied to, it&#39;s because you agreed to get lied to.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Truth number one about lying:<br \/>\nLying&#39;s a cooperative act. Now not all lies are harmful. Sometimes we&#39;re willing<br \/>\nparticipants in deception for the sake of social dignity, maybe to keep a secret that should<br \/>\nbe kept secret, secret. We say, &quot;Nice song.&quot; &quot;Honey, you don&#39;t look fat in that, no.&quot; Or we say, favorite of the digiratti, &quot;You know, I just fished<br \/>\nthat email out of my Spam folder. So sorry.&quot; But there are times when we are unwilling<br \/>\nparticipants in deception. And that can have dramatic costs for us. Last year saw 997 billion dollars in corporate fraud alone<br \/>\nin the United States.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s an eyelash<br \/>\nunder a trillion dollars. That&#39;s seven percent of revenues. Deception can cost billions. Think Enron, Madoff, the mortgage crisis. Or in the case<br \/>\nof double agents and traitors, like Robert Hanssen or Aldrich Ames, lies can betray our country, they can compromise our security,<br \/>\nthey can undermine democracy, they can cause the deaths<br \/>\nof those that defend us. Deception is actually serious business. This con man, Henry Oberlander,<br \/>\nhe was such an effective con man, British authorities say he could have undermined the entire<br \/>\nbanking system of the Western world. And you can&#39;t find this guy on Google;<br \/>\nyou can&#39;t find him anywhere. He was interviewed once,<br \/>\nand he said the following. He said, &quot;Look, I&#39;ve got one rule.&quot; And this was Henry&#39;s rule, he said, &quot;Look, everyone is willing<br \/>\nto give you something.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>They&#39;re ready to give you something<br \/>\nfor whatever it is they&#39;re hungry for.&quot; And that&#39;s the crux of it. If you don&#39;t want to be<br \/>\ndeceived, you have to know, what is it that you&#39;re hungry for? And we all kind of hate to admit it. We wish we were<br \/>\nbetter husbands, better wives, smarter, more powerful, taller, richer &#8212; the list goes on. Lying is an attempt to bridge that gap, to connect our wishes and our fantasies about who we wish we were,<br \/>\nhow we wish we could be, with what we&#39;re really like. And boy are we willing to fill in<br \/>\nthose gaps in our lives with lies. On a given day, studies show<br \/>\nthat you may be lied to anywhere from 10 to 200 times. Now granted, many of those are white lies. But in another study, it showed that strangers lied three times within the first 10 minutes<br \/>\nof meeting each other. (Laughter) Now when we first hear<br \/>\nthis data, we recoil. We can&#39;t believe how prevalent lying is. We&#39;re essentially against lying.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>But if you look more closely,<br \/>\nthe plot actually thickens. We lie more to strangers<br \/>\nthan we lie to coworkers. Extroverts lie more than introverts. Men lie eight times more about themselves<br \/>\nthan they do other people. Women lie more to protect other people. If you&#39;re an average married couple, you&#39;re going to lie to your spouse<br \/>\nin one out of every 10 interactions. Now, you may think that&#39;s bad. If you&#39;re unmarried,<br \/>\nthat number drops to three. Lying&#39;s complex. It&#39;s woven into the fabric<br \/>\nof our daily and our business lives. We&#39;re deeply ambivalent about the truth. We parse it out on an as-needed basis, sometimes for very good reasons, other times just because<br \/>\nwe don&#39;t understand the gaps in our lives.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>That&#39;s truth number two about lying. We&#39;re against lying, but we&#39;re covertly for it in ways that our society has sanctioned<br \/>\nfor centuries and centuries and centuries. It&#39;s as old as breathing. It&#39;s part of our culture,<br \/>\nit&#39;s part of our history. Think Dante, Shakespeare,<br \/>\nthe Bible, News of the World. (Laughter) Lying has evolutionary value<br \/>\nto us as a species. Researchers have long known<br \/>\nthat the more intelligent the species, the larger the neocortex, the more likely it is to be deceptive. Now you might remember Koko. Does anybody remember Koko the gorilla<br \/>\nwho was taught sign language? Koko was taught to communicate<br \/>\nvia sign language. Here&#39;s Koko with her kitten. It&#39;s her cute little, fluffy pet kitten. Koko once blamed her pet kitten<br \/>\nfor ripping a sink out of the wall. (Laughter) We&#39;re hardwired to become<br \/>\nleaders of the pack. It&#39;s starts really, really early. How early? Well babies will fake a cry, pause, wait to see who&#39;s coming and then go right back to crying. One-year-olds learn concealment. (Laughter) Two-year-olds bluff. Five-year-olds lie outright. They manipulate via flattery.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Nine-year-olds, masters of the cover-up. By the time you enter college, you&#39;re going to lie to your mom<br \/>\nin one out of every five interactions. By the time we enter this work world<br \/>\nand we&#39;re breadwinners, we enter a world that is just cluttered<br \/>\nwith Spam, fake digital friends, partisan media, ingenious identity thieves, world-class Ponzi schemers, a deception epidemic &#8212; in short, what one author calls<br \/>\na post-truth society. It&#39;s been very confusing<br \/>\nfor a long time now. What do you do? Well, there are steps we can take<br \/>\nto navigate our way through the morass. Trained liespotters get to the truth<br \/>\n90 percent of the time. The rest of us,<br \/>\nwe&#39;re only 54 percent accurate. Why is it so easy to learn? There are good liars and bad liars. There are no real original liars. We all make the same mistakes.<br \/>\nWe all use the same techniques.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>So what I&#39;m going to do is I&#39;m going<br \/>\nto show you two patterns of deception. And then we&#39;re going<br \/>\nto look at the hot spots and see if we can find them ourselves. We&#39;re going to start with speech. (Video) Bill Clinton:<br \/>\nI want you to listen to me. I&#39;m going to say this again. I did not have sexual relations<br \/>\nwith that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie,<br \/>\nnot a single time, never. And these allegations are false. And I need to go back to work<br \/>\nfor the American people. Thank you. (Applause) Pamela Meyer: Okay,<br \/>\nwhat were the telltale signs? Well first we heard what&#39;s known<br \/>\nas a non-contracted denial. Studies show that people<br \/>\nwho are overdetermined in their denial will resort to formal rather<br \/>\nthan informal language. We also heard<br \/>\ndistancing language: &quot;that woman.&quot; We know that liars will unconsciously<br \/>\ndistance themselves from their subject, using language as their tool.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Now if Bill Clinton had said,<br \/>\n&quot;Well, to tell you the truth &#8230;&quot; or Richard Nixon&#39;s favorite,<br \/>\n&quot;In all candor &#8230;&quot; he would have been a dead giveaway for any liespotter that knows that qualifying language, as it&#39;s called,<br \/>\nqualifying language like that, further discredits the subject. Now if he had repeated<br \/>\nthe question in its entirety, or if he had peppered his account<br \/>\nwith a little too much detail &#8212; and we&#39;re all really glad<br \/>\nhe didn&#39;t do that &#8212; he would have further discredited himself. Freud had it right. Freud said, look,<br \/>\nthere&#39;s much more to it than speech: &quot;No mortal can keep a secret.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>If his lips are silent,<br \/>\nhe chatters with his fingertips.&quot; And we all do it no matter<br \/>\nhow powerful you are. We all chatter with our fingertips. I&#39;m going to show you<br \/>\nDominique Strauss-Kahn with Obama who&#39;s chattering with his fingertips. (Laughter) Now this brings us to our next pattern,<br \/>\nwhich is body language. With body language,<br \/>\nhere&#39;s what you&#39;ve got to do. You&#39;ve really got to just throw<br \/>\nyour assumptions out the door. Let the science temper<br \/>\nyour knowledge a little bit. Because we think liars<br \/>\nfidget all the time. Well guess what, they&#39;re known to freeze<br \/>\ntheir upper bodies when they&#39;re lying. We think liars won&#39;t look you in the eyes. Well guess what, they look<br \/>\nyou in the eyes a little too much just to compensate for that myth. We think warmth and smiles<br \/>\nconvey honesty, sincerity. But a trained liespotter<br \/>\ncan spot a fake smile a mile away. Can you all spot the fake smile here? You can consciously contract<br \/>\nthe muscles in your cheeks.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>But the real smile&#39;s in the eyes,<br \/>\nthe crow&#39;s feet of the eyes. They cannot be consciously contracted, especially if you overdid the Botox. Don&#39;t overdo the Botox;<br \/>\nnobody will think you&#39;re honest. Now we&#39;re going to look at the hot spots. Can you tell what&#39;s happening<br \/>\nin a conversation? Can you start to find the hot spots to see the discrepancies between someone&#39;s words<br \/>\nand someone&#39;s actions? Now, I know it seems really obvious, but when you&#39;re having a conversation<br \/>\nwith someone you suspect of deception, attitude is by far the most overlooked<br \/>\nbut telling of indicators. An honest person<br \/>\nis going to be cooperative. They&#39;re going to show<br \/>\nthey&#39;re on your side.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><img src='https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/7092528\/pexels-photo-7092528.jpeg?auto=compress&#038;cs=tinysrgb&#038;h=650&#038;w=940'><\/p>\n<p>They&#39;re going to be enthusiastic. They&#39;re going to be willing and helpful<br \/>\nto getting you to the truth. They&#39;re going to be willing<br \/>\nto brainstorm, name suspects, provide details. They&#39;re going to say, &quot;Hey, maybe it was those guys in payroll<br \/>\nthat forged those checks.&quot; They&#39;re going to be infuriated<br \/>\nif they sense they&#39;re wrongly accused throughout the entire course<br \/>\nof the interview, not just in flashes; they&#39;ll be infuriated throughout<br \/>\nthe entire course of the interview. And if you ask someone honest what should happen<br \/>\nto whomever did forge those checks, an honest person is much more likely to recommend strict rather<br \/>\nthan lenient punishment. Now let&#39;s say you&#39;re having<br \/>\nthat exact same conversation with someone deceptive. That person may be withdrawn, look down, lower their voice, pause, be kind of herky-jerky. Ask a deceptive person<br \/>\nto tell their story, they&#39;re going to pepper it<br \/>\nwith way too much detail in all kinds of irrelevant places. And then they&#39;re going to tell their story<br \/>\nin strict chronological order. And what a trained interrogator does is they come in and in very subtle ways<br \/>\nover the course of several hours, they will ask that person<br \/>\nto tell that story backwards, and then they&#39;ll watch them squirm, and track which questions produce<br \/>\nthe highest volume of deceptive tells.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Why do they do that?<br \/>\nWell, we all do the same thing. We rehearse our words, but we rarely rehearse our gestures. We say &quot;yes,&quot; we shake our heads &quot;no.&quot; We tell very convincing stories,<br \/>\nwe slightly shrug our shoulders. We commit terrible crimes, and we smile at the delight<br \/>\nin getting away with it. Now, that smile is known<br \/>\nin the trade as &quot;duping delight.&quot; And we&#39;re going to see that<br \/>\nin several videos moving forward, but we&#39;re going to start &#8212;<br \/>\nfor those of you who don&#39;t know him, this is presidential<br \/>\ncandidate John Edwards who shocked America by fathering<br \/>\na child out of wedlock. We&#39;re going to see him talk<br \/>\nabout getting a paternity test. See now if you can spot him<br \/>\nsaying, &quot;yes&quot; while shaking his head &quot;no,&quot; slightly shrugging his shoulders. (Video) John Edwards: I&#39;d be happy<br \/>\nto participate in one. I know that it&#39;s not possible<br \/>\nthat this child could be mine, because of the timing of events.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>So I know it&#39;s not possible. Happy to take a paternity test,<br \/>\nand would love to see it happen. Interviewer: Are you going to do<br \/>\nthat soon? Is there somebody &#8212; JE: Well, I&#39;m only one side.<br \/>\nI&#39;m only one side of the test. But I&#39;m happy to participate in one. PM: Okay, those head shakes<br \/>\nare much easier to spot once you know to look for them. There are going to be times<br \/>\nwhen someone makes one expression while masking another that just<br \/>\nkind of leaks through in a flash. Murderers are known to leak sadness. Your new joint venture partner<br \/>\nmight shake your hand, celebrate, go out to dinner with you<br \/>\nand then leak an expression of anger. And we&#39;re not all going to become<br \/>\nfacial expression experts overnight here, but there&#39;s one I can teach you<br \/>\nthat&#39;s very dangerous and it&#39;s easy to learn, and that&#39;s the expression of contempt.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Now with anger, you&#39;ve got<br \/>\ntwo people on an even playing field. It&#39;s still somewhat<br \/>\nof a healthy relationship. But when anger turns to contempt,<br \/>\nyou&#39;ve been dismissed. It&#39;s associated with moral superiority. And for that reason, it&#39;s very,<br \/>\nvery hard to recover from. Here&#39;s what it looks like. It&#39;s marked by one lip corner<br \/>\npulled up and in. It&#39;s the only asymmetrical expression. And in the presence of contempt,<br \/>\nwhether or not deception follows &#8212; and it doesn&#39;t always follow &#8212; look the other way,<br \/>\ngo the other direction, reconsider the deal, say, &quot;No thank you.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>I&#39;m not coming up<br \/>\nfor just one more nightcap. Thank you.&quot; Science has surfaced<br \/>\nmany, many more indicators. We know, for example, we know liars will shift their blink rate, point their feet towards an exit. They will take barrier objects and put them between themselves<br \/>\nand the person that is interviewing them. They&#39;ll alter their vocal tone, often making their vocal tone much lower. Now here&#39;s the deal. These behaviors are just behaviors. They&#39;re not proof of deception. They&#39;re red flags. We&#39;re human beings. We make deceptive flailing gestures<br \/>\nall over the place all day long.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>They don&#39;t mean anything<br \/>\nin and of themselves. But when you see clusters<br \/>\nof them, that&#39;s your signal. Look, listen, probe,<br \/>\nask some hard questions, get out of that very comfortable<br \/>\nmode of knowing, walk into curiosity mode,<br \/>\nask more questions, have a little dignity, treat the person<br \/>\nyou&#39;re talking to with rapport. Don&#39;t try to be like those folks<br \/>\non &quot;Law &amp; Order&quot; and those other TV shows that pummel their subjects<br \/>\ninto submission.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Don&#39;t be too aggressive, it doesn&#39;t work. Now, we&#39;ve talked a little bit<br \/>\nabout how to talk to someone who&#39;s lying and how to spot a lie. And as I promised, we&#39;re now going<br \/>\nto look at what the truth looks like. But I&#39;m going to show you two videos, two mothers &#8212; one is lying,<br \/>\none is telling the truth. And these were surfaced by researcher<br \/>\nDavid Matsumoto in California. And I think they&#39;re an excellent example<br \/>\nof what the truth looks like. This mother, Diane Downs, shot her kids at close range, drove them to the hospital<br \/>\nwhile they bled all over the car, claimed a scraggy-haired stranger did it. And you&#39;ll see when you see the video, she can&#39;t even pretend<br \/>\nto be an agonizing mother.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>What you want to look for here<br \/>\nis an incredible discrepancy between horrific events that she describes<br \/>\nand her very, very cool demeanor. And if you look closely, you&#39;ll see<br \/>\nduping delight throughout this video. (Video) Diane Downs:<br \/>\nAt night when I close my eyes, I can see Christie reaching<br \/>\nher hand out to me while I&#39;m driving, and the blood just kept<br \/>\ncoming out of her mouth. And that &#8212; maybe<br \/>\nit&#39;ll fade too with time &#8212; but I don&#39;t think so. That bothers me the most. PM: Now I&#39;m going to show you a video of an actual grieving mother,<br \/>\nErin Runnion, confronting her daughter&#39;s murderer<br \/>\nand torturer in court.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Here you&#39;re going to see no false emotion, just the authentic expression<br \/>\nof a mother&#39;s agony. (Video) Erin Runnion:<br \/>\nI wrote this statement on the third anniversary<br \/>\nof the night you took my baby, and you hurt her, and you crushed her, you terrified her until her heart stopped. And she fought, and I know she fought you. But I know she looked at you<br \/>\nwith those amazing brown eyes, and you still wanted to kill her.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>And I don&#39;t understand it, and I never will. PM: Okay, there&#39;s no doubting<br \/>\nthe veracity of those emotions. Now the technology<br \/>\naround what the truth looks like is progressing on, the science of it. We know, for example, that we now have specialized eye trackers<br \/>\nand infrared brain scans, MRI&#39;s that can decode the signals<br \/>\nthat our bodies send out when we&#39;re trying to be deceptive. And these technologies are going<br \/>\nto be marketed to all of us as panaceas for deceit, and they will prove<br \/>\nincredibly useful some day. But you&#39;ve got to ask yourself<br \/>\nin the meantime: Who do you want on your side<br \/>\nof the meeting, someone who&#39;s trained<br \/>\nin getting to the truth or some guy who&#39;s going to drag<br \/>\na 400-pound electroencephalogram through the door? Liespotters rely on human tools.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>They know, as someone once said, &quot;Character&#39;s who you are in the dark.&quot; And what&#39;s kind of interesting<br \/>\nis that today, we have so little darkness. Our world is lit up 24 hours a day. It&#39;s transparent<br \/>\nwith blogs and social networks broadcasting the buzz<br \/>\nof a whole new generation of people that have made a choice to live<br \/>\ntheir lives in public. It&#39;s a much more noisy world. So one challenge we have is to remember, oversharing, that&#39;s not honesty.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Our manic tweeting and texting<br \/>\ncan blind us to the fact that the subtleties<br \/>\nof human decency &#8212; character integrity &#8212; that&#39;s still what matters,<br \/>\nthat&#39;s always what&#39;s going to matter. So in this much noisier world, it might make sense for us to be just a little bit more explicit<br \/>\nabout our moral code. When you combine the science<br \/>\nof recognizing deception with the art of looking, listening, you exempt yourself<br \/>\nfrom collaborating in a lie. You start up that path<br \/>\nof being just a little bit more explicit, because you signal to everyone around you, you say, &quot;Hey, my world, our world,<br \/>\nit&#39;s going to be an honest one.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>My world is going to be<br \/>\none where truth is strengthened and falsehood is recognized<br \/>\nand marginalized.&quot; And when you do that, the ground around you starts<br \/>\nto shift just a little bit. And that&#39;s the truth. Thank you. (Applause). <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=P_6vDLq64gE\" target=\"_blank\">per YouTube<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Okay, now I don&#39;t want to alarm anybody in this room, but it&#39;s just come to my attention that the person to your right is a liar. (Laughter) Also, the person to your left is a liar. Also the person sitting in your very seats is a liar. We&#39;re all liars. What I&#39;m going to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,254,90],"tags":[286,280,37,341,288,284,45,345,115,285,283,287,279,278,44,343,281,342,184,282,273,276,274,344],"class_list":["post-1012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-polygraph-blog","category-polygraph-news","category-polygraph-training","tag-clues","tag-culture","tag-deception","tag-history","tag-honesty","tag-liars","tag-lie-detector","tag-lie-to-me","tag-lies","tag-liespotting","tag-lying","tag-manners","tag-meyer","tag-pamela","tag-polygraph","tag-polygraph-science","tag-psychology","tag-review","tag-science","tag-society","tag-ted","tag-tedglobal","tag-tedtalks","tag-truth-detector"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1012"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1052,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012\/revisions\/1052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morganpolygraph.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}